what’s the real cost of not evaluating your agencies?
Without structured performance reviews, issues surface late, value quietly leaks away, and relationships drift towards a pitch. See how much value structured agency evaluation could protect.
Your largest or most strategic relationships, which get an in-depth, two-way review. Your wider roster is tracked as standard.
Fees and retainers, excluding working media.
Annual fees with all your other agencies. Put 0 if those are your only ones.
Value at risk each year
£0
- Potential saving opportunity
- –
- Potential saving
- –
- Annual chance of a pitch
- –
See the working
| Per year | As you are | With Agency Evaluation |
|---|
how we worked this out
The estimate compares two costs over the period you choose.
Carrying on as you are includes value lost to under-performance, which we put at between 1.5% and 6% of agency fees depending on how you review agencies today. Most marketers surveyed by the ANA put the loss at up to 30%, so we’ve stayed well below that.4 It also includes the expected cost of a pitch: the chance of one each year, based on average agency tenure,2 multiplied by the client’s cost of running it (around £300k)1 plus the transition, typically around 20% more resource for three to six months while a new agency beds in.3
Where your agencies deliver changes the size of a pitch. We scale the pitch cost down for a single market and up for a global one, where more markets, stakeholders and agencies are involved, and use the short or long end of the three-to-six-month transition range accordingly.
With Proctimise Agency Evaluation, our experience is that the less structured your reviews are today, the more there is to gain. Between a quarter and 60% of the lost value with your key agencies is recovered, and around half that across the rest of your roster, where tracking is lighter-touch. That comes through earlier, evidence-based conversations. Pitches also become 15–35% less likely. Half of marketers say incumbent performance triggered their last review,1 and structured evaluation resolves many of those issues before they get that far. Reviewing key agencies once a year rather than twice gives a slightly smaller benefit. The saving is shown before programme fees, which we tailor to each client.
Sources
- ANA and 4A’s, The Cost of the Pitch (2023).
- ANA and 4As, Client-Agency AOR Relationship Tenure (2025). Integrated agencies average 7.3 years, media agencies 3.7 years; “a mix of both” uses the midpoint. Annual pitch likelihood is estimated as one divided by average tenure, adjusted for how you review performance today.
- TrinityP3, How do you manage a successful transition to a new agency?
- ANA, survey on client/agency relationship management (2021). See also ANA and 4A’s, The Business Case for Relationship Management (2020).
This calculator gives an indicative estimate, not a forecast or a quote. Most published benchmarks are from US research, and the link between evaluation and fewer pitches is an association rather than proven cause. Savings are shown before programme fees. © Proctimise Limited

